
Why was Licious the choice only for big-occasion moments?

the situation
Licious built the fresh meat delivery category. Awareness sat at 60%, product reviews were strong, and their quality was superior. But consideration had stalled, and a large share of customers were buying only once every 60 days. People liked the products, but ordering from Licious was not becoming a default habit.
Angles of inquiry
What keeps light users who like Licious, from coming back sooner?
Where does the brand lose to quick commerce & grocery apps?
When does a Licious-sized order actually make sense in the week?
Our team went and met 30+ people in meat-eating households across regions & backgrounds across the country.
What we found
Light users only turned to Licious when they knew a big occasion was coming: something worth planning a full cart for (orders over ₹400-500). Without that trigger, the grocery app won on speed and convenience. Weekday routines narrowed things further; between office schedules, school runs, and fasting days, meat didn't make it into most weekday meals. The window of relevance was narrow.
The one recurring meat-eating occasion that surfaced was Sunday lunch. Family at home, nowhere to be, everyone at the table. Multiple dishes were made, often multiple kinds of meat too. But most households only thought about the menu on Sunday morning, which was too late for Licious' next-day delivery model. The real opportunity wasn't a better product message. It was getting into the consideration set a day earlier.
The solution
System of solutions
A campaign that reminded families that Sundays deserve a full spread worth pre-planning for.


